|
Text
Comprehension
Text Comprehension
The
National Reading Panel (NICHD, 2000a; 2000b; 2001) identified five
essential components of reading instruction. One of those components
was text comprehension instruction. Attention is given to this
component in every Reading Recovery lesson.
Text Comprehension Instruction from Put
Reading First
(NICHD, 2001)
Definition: “Comprehension is the reason for reading. If
readers can read the words but do not understand what they are
reading, they are not really reading.” (p. 48)
- “Good readers are purposeful. Good readers have a purpose
for reading.” (p. 48)
- “Good readers are active. Good readers think actively as
they read. To make sense of what they read, good readers engage
in a complicated process. [They use] their experiences and
knowledge of the world, their knowledge of vocabulary and
language structure, and their knowledge of reading strategies.”
(p. 48)
- “Text comprehension can be improved by instruction that
helps readers use specific comprehension strategies:” (p. 49)
-
Monitoring
comprehension: being aware of what they do and do not understand
and using appropriate “fix-up” strategies to solve problems in
comprehension
-
Using graphic
and semantic organizers
-
Answering
questions about the text
-
Generating
questions about the text
-
Recognizing
story structure
-
Summarizing:
identifying main themes and central ideas while eliminating
unnecessary and redundant information
-
Making use of
prior knowledge: drawing on prior knowledge and experience to
help with understanding
-
Using mental
imagery (pp. 49–56)
- “Teachers should emphasize text comprehension from the
beginning, rather than waiting until students have mastered the
basics of reading.”
(p. 55)
Text Comprehension Instruction in Reading
Recovery
“I define reading
as a message-getting, problem-solving activity which increases in
power and flexibility the more it is practiced. My definition states
that within the directional constraints of the printer’s cue,
language and visual perception responses are purposefully directed
by the reader in some integrated way to the problem of extracting
meaning from cues in a text, in sequence, so that the reader brings
a maximum of understanding to the author’s message.” (Clay, 1991, p.
6)
Teaching for meaning in Reading Recovery starts with the first
lesson. Children learn that understanding is the ultimate goal of
reading. As they gain phonemic awareness, phonics and decoding
skills, fluency, and vocabulary, the teacher supports children’s
active use of these abilities while simultaneously making sense of
what is read.
Reading Recovery teachers give careful attention to children’s
development of the following processes:
- Monitoring their own reading, being aware of what they do
and do not understand
- Using information in text to gain meaning (e.g., letter
sequences, word sequences)
- Using prior knowledge to support meaning
- Taking the initiative to self-correct when the text does not
make sense
- Discovering new things within the text
- Asking their own questions about the text
- Building concepts about how books and stories work
Ways in which Reading Recovery teachers support the development
of these processes in young children include the following teaching
moves:
- Selecting texts that will support the child’s present
knowledge and skills
- Selecting a variety of texts and text types to promote the
flexible use of the child’s knowledge in new situations
- Introducing texts by activating prior knowledge about the
story and building experiences needed to enhance understanding
- Emphasizing what the child already knows that will help in
solving words and interpreting the story
- Building connections during and after reading to support
understanding
- Having meaningful conversations about the text
- Holding the child accountable for meaning during oral
reading through such prompts as “Did that make sense?”
- Examining records of oral reading behavior for evidence of
meaning-making and adjust teaching objectives accordingly
- Teaching for comprehension when children are writing as well
as when they are reading. The reciprocal nature of the two
processes will be mutually supportive
Because Reading Recovery teachers work with children who are
demonstrating unique difficulties, approaches to comprehension
instruction must be appropriate for each individual. Teachers must
be knowledgeable and flexible in supporting comprehension in young
readers and writers.
References
Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of
inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000a).
Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read:
An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature
on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH
Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
Office
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000b).
Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read:
An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature
on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of
the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC:
U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH,
DHHS (2001). Put reading first: Helping your child learn to read.
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
|